Skipping $2m EBITDA Deals ("The Messy Middle")

Dan Tamkin of Resurgent Capital Partners shares his barbell strategy for lower-middle market PE deals, avoiding the "messy middle" to maximize returns.

Dan Tamkin

Dan Tamkin, based in California and co-founder of Resurgent Capital Partners, is an operator, technologist, and turnaround investor, in that order. After a career revolving around tech turnarounds and challenged VC portcos, he has found the lower-middle market to be a better channel for value creation, especially when done via the deal-by-deal model of independent sponsorship.

Resurgent began in 2017 and now has a portfolio of 6 platforms, split 3 vs. 3 between larger deals that required external equity and smaller companies they could buy outright. They follow a barbell strategy: concentrate on very small deals (~$0.5m EBITDA) that they can control and on larger deals ($5m+ EBITDA) where the upside is meaningful, while avoiding the middle, while skipping the $2-4m EBITDA range. Their underwriting targets an "acceptable return" by keeping stable and/or fixing 1–2 core issues, then views "explosive return" as a potential that can materialy if one or more growth levers are realized.

They built Resurgent through bootstrapping. Dan had a consulting turnaround job that generated revenue which seeded Resurgent. His partner, Bryce, used that runway to source deals, travel, and acquire a small cash-flowing asset. This early holding created a track record and stable income.

Dan warns repeatedly about the $2m EBITDA case study, which he calls "the messy middle." Here's his math: Buy at 5x ($10m EV), double EBITDA to $4m over 5 years, and exit at 5x again ($20m EV). After 20 percent carry, fees, and taxes, the sponsor duo might net only ~$500k per partner for years of work.

He contrasts the lower-middle market PE with venture capital. In VC, boards are composed of fund investors who have different fund timeline, portfolio pressures, and motivations, all of which skews and delays decision-making. The lower-middle market offers a dynamic with stable businesses under clear ownership, a couple of discrete, endogenous* fixable problems, and achievable value creation without relying on optimism about market dominance.

More recent episodes

Lisa Piercey
EP.
77
with
Lisa Piercey

The Doctor & The Finance Bro

Dr. Lisa Piercey’s path spans pediatric medicine, hospital leadership, Tennessee Health Commissioner and now independent sponsor nearing her fifth healthcare platform. Her edge: deep operating and policy expertise across reimbursement, Medicaid, aging and value-based care.

Drew Bagin
EP.
76
with
Drew Bagin

$2M to Start as an IndependentSponsor

Drew Bagin and his partner raised $2m in GP seed capital before their first independent sponsor deal. Five platforms later, their New England focus has created a differentiated sourcing and value-creation network, with a fire protection platform nearing exit.

General Partners
EP.
75
with
General Partners

Behind The Scenes: Our Unique Angle In An Increasingly Crowded Space

The 3 founding partners mark the 75th episode with a behind-the-scenes look at their strategy, discussing rollup frequency, first-time sponsor pitfalls, AI in underwriting and capital supply-demand imbalances across the independent sponsor ecosystem.

new episode every week
new episode every week
new episode every week
new episode every week
new episode every week
new episode every week

Be the first to know about new episodes!

Receive summaries of our weekly interview drops:
Thank you! You've subscribed to our podcast list.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Want to recommend a guest for the Minds Capital Podcast?
Send an email to podcast@mindscapital.co.